نظریه‌پردازی در مدیریت: چالش‌ها و فرصت‌ها

نوع مقاله : سخن سردبیر

نویسنده

هیأت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

10.48308/jbmp.2025.105326

چکیده

نظریه‌پردازی در مدیریت به عنوان یکی از ابزارهای اصلی برای درک و پیش‌بینی پدیده‌های مدیریتی شناخته می‌شود. این مقاله با بررسی اهمیت نظریه‌ها و چالش‌های مرتبط با نظریه‌پردازی، چارچوبی برای مشارکت‌های نظری در حوزه مدیریت ارائه می‌دهد. در این مقاله، پنج سطح مشارکت نظری شامل گزارشگران، آزمون‌کنندگان، تعدیل‌کنندگان، سازندگان و گسترش‌دهندگان مورد بررسی قرار گرفته‌اند. همچنین، هشت اهرم نظریه‌پردازی شامل سوال تحقیق، روش نظریه‌پردازی، سطح تحلیل، پدیده مورد مطالعه، مکانیسم‌های علّی، سازه‌ها و متغیرها، شرایط مرزی و خروجی‌ها معرفی شده‌اند. این مقاله نشان می‌دهد که چگونه تغییر در هر یک از این اهرم‌ها می‌تواند به ایجاد مشارکت‌های نظری جدید کمک کند. در نهایت، این مقاله به دانشجویان و محققان مدیریت توصیه می‌کند که به جای تمرکز صرف بر نظریه‌های موجود، به دنبال کشف پدیده‌های جدید و ارائه (بحث‌ها) و توضیحات نوآورانه باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Theorizing in Management: Challenges and Opportunities

نویسنده [English]

  • Bahman Hajipour
Professor
چکیده [English]

Theory building in management is recognized as one of the primary tools for understanding and predicting managerial phenomena. This article, by examining the importance of theories and the challenges associated with theory building, provides a framework for theoretical contributions in the field of management. In this article, five levels of theoretical contribution, including reporters, testers, moderators, builders, and expanders, are examined. Additionally, eight levers of theory building, including research question, theory-building method, level of analysis, phenomenon under study, causal mechanisms, constructs and variables, boundary conditions, and outputs, are introduced. This article demonstrates how changes in each of these levers can contribute to the creation of new theoretical contributions. Finally, this article recommends that students and management researchers, instead of focusing solely on existing theories, seek to discover new phenomena and provide innovative explanations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Theory building
  • management
  • theoretical contributions
  • theory-building framework
  • managerial phenomena
Adner, R., Polos, L., Ryall, M. D., & Sorenson, O. (2009). The case for formal theory. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.36982628
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231
Barney, J. B. (1989). Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: A comment. Management Science, 35(12), 1511-1513. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1511
Barney, J. B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). Strategic groups: Untested assertions and research proposals. Managerial and Decision Economics, 11(3), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090110305
Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43-53.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Stuart, H. W. (1996). Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1996.00005.x
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2011). Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what- should-be studies---And triangulation. Organization Science, 22(5), 1195-1202. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0635
Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-134. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161567
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail .Harvard Business Review Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281- 1303.
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480- 499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351453
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019-1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 909-928. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.384
Gibbons, R. (1992). Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press. Gibbons, R. (2005). Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(2), 200-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.010
Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Free Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346-1352.
Helfat, C. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004). Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1217- 1232. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.427
Henderson, R. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 24(2), 248-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555761
Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37(1), 19- 33. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.1.19
Levinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934- 950. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319- 338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
Makadok, R., Burton, R., & Barney, J. (2018). A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1530-1545.
March, J. G. (2006). Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic management journal, 27(3), 201-214.
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Rumelt, R. P. (2011). Good strategy/bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. Crown Business. Sorenson, O., & Carroll, G. R. (2021). The emergence of organizational routines. Princeton University Press.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048- 7333(86)90027-2
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Turner, S. F., Cardinal, L. B., & Burton, R. M. (2017). Research design for mixed methods. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 243–267.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308376
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.
Zenger, T. R., & Felin, T. (2009). The firm as a nexus of contracts: A critical examination. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00810.x