Investigating the relationship between the use of technological opportunities and the factors affecting it with the organization's financial performance from the perspective of branch managers in banks

Document Type : literature review


  1. Akin, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., & Wynstra, F. (2009). The Impact of Supply Chain-RelatedFactors on Environmental Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Turkey .Paper presented at the 18th IPSERA Conference.
  2. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61−83.
  3. Chen, CH., & Lien, N. (2012).Technological Opportunism and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Research.

10.Chin, W.W. (1998 ). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22(1),7-16.

11.Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Journal of ManagementScience, 32, 554-571.

12.Daft, R.L. & Weick, K.E. (1984).Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, 9)2(, 284–295.

13.Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U., & Webster Jr, F.E. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37.

14.Dhebar, A. (1996). Speeding High-Tech Producer, Meet the Balking Consumer :SloanManagement Review, 37(2), 37−49.

15.Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J.M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(5), 77-90.

16.Grant, R.M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications (7th ed). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

17.Hills, S.B., & Sarin, S. (2003). From Market Driven to Market Driving: An Alternate Paradigm for Marketing High Technology Product and Innovations. Journal of MarketingTheory and Practice, 11(3), 13–24.

18.Hulland, J .(1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195-224.

19.Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something Old, Something New: A longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183−1194.

20.Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational Market Information Processing: Cultural Antecedents and NewProduct Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 318-335.

21.Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D.M. (2004). New Products, Salespromotions and Firm Value, with Application to the Automobile Industry. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 142−156.

22.Robertson, T.S., Eliashberg, J., & Rymon, T. (1995). New Product Announcement Signalsand Incumbent Reactions. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 1−15.

23.Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.

24.Sarkees, M. (2011). Understanding the Links Between Technological Opportunism,Marketing Emphasisand Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 23,785-795.

25.Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G.L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2001). Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E[1]business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47−60.

26.Srinivasan, R. (2000). Essays on Technological Opportunism in Adoption of Radical Technologies by Firms. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

27.Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–53.

  1. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5,171-80.

29.Wind , J., & Mahajan , V. (1997). Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development:An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 1−12