Developing an Indigenous Model of Organizational Entrepreneurship in Knowledge-Based Companies Using a Grounded Theory Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, ‎Iran‎

2 Department of ‎Interdisciplinary Sciences, Faculty of Strategic Sciences and Technologies, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran‏.‏‎

3 Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, ‎Qazvin, Iran‎

4 Department of Industrial Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, ‎Iran‎

Abstract

Objectives: Organizational entrepreneurship represents a transformative approach that enables organizations to cultivate innovation, enhance competitiveness, and create sustainable value in knowledge-intensive environments. In the context of knowledge-based companies, which serve as critical engines for economic growth and technological advancement, organizational entrepreneurship becomes particularly vital for maintaining competitive advantage in rapidly evolving markets. These companies, characterized by their reliance on intellectual capital and technological innovation, require specialized entrepreneurial drivers that align with their unique operational dynamics and strategic objectives. The present study aims to develop a comprehensive, contextually relevant model of organizational entrepreneurship drivers specifically tailored to the needs and challenges of knowledge-based companies operating in emerging economies.

Methods: This research employs a rigorous qualitative approach based on the Grounded Theory methodology, following the systematic coding procedures developed by Strauss and Corbin. The study population comprised 29 carefully selected participants, including senior academic experts specializing in entrepreneurship and innovation, experienced management consultants with proven track records in knowledge-based enterprises, and founders or senior executives of established knowledge-based companies in Kermanshah Province. The sampling strategy utilized purposive and snowball sampling techniques to ensure the inclusion of information-rich cases that could provide deep insights into the phenomenon under investigation. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, ensuring comprehensive coverage of all relevant concepts and categories. The trustworthiness of the research was established through multiple validation strategies, including member checking, expert validation, and peer debriefing. For reliability assessment, inter-coder agreement was measured using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient, which yielded a robust value of 0.87, indicating strong reliability and consistency in the coding process.
Findings: The analysis revealed a sophisticated multi-dimensional framework of organizational entrepreneurship drivers, organized into five interconnected dimensions:
Causal Factors: The fundamental drivers initiating entrepreneurial activities include strategic leadership commitment, characterized by active top management support and visionary guidance; organizational architecture, featuring flexible structures and decentralized decision-making processes; and the knowledge ecosystem, encompassing open communication channels and systematic knowledge-sharing mechanisms.
Contextual Factors: The environmental enablers comprise market dynamics and business environment conditions; technological infrastructure, including advanced information and communication technology systems; the financial ecosystem, involving accessible funding sources and investment opportunities; academic–industrial collaboration through interaction with educational and research institutions; and supportive government policies and regulatory frameworks.
Intervening Factors: The mediating influences include organizational culture elements such as innovation climate and risk tolerance; structural characteristics involving hierarchy and coordination mechanisms; leadership styles and management approaches; resource configurations including human, financial, and technological assets; and stakeholder engagement strategies.
Strategic Initiatives: The implementation approaches encompass strategic orientation through clear business strategies and competitive positioning; knowledge management systems facilitating organizational learning and capability development; and motivation structures including comprehensive reward and incentive systems aligned with entrepreneurial outcomes.
Outcomes and Impacts: The resulting manifestations include cultural transformation toward an entrepreneurial mindset and behaviors; human capital development through employee empowerment and continuous training; innovation pipeline management via systematic project prioritization; and collaborative synergy through cross-functional integration and partnership development.

Conclusion: The proposed model offers a holistic framework that captures the complex interplay of factors driving organizational entrepreneurship in knowledge-based companies. The research contributes significantly to both theoretical understanding and practical implementation by providing a structured approach to fostering entrepreneurial capabilities within knowledge-intensive organizations. The model emphasizes the importance of simultaneous attention to all identified dimensions and suggests that successful organizational entrepreneurship implementation requires strategic alignment across multiple organizational levels and functions. For practitioners, the study offers actionable insights for designing intervention strategies and development programs, while for researchers, it provides a foundation for further empirical validation and theoretical refinement in different contextual settings.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abbaszadeh., Alizadeh Aghdam, & Mirzaei, M. (2015). Investigating the role of social capital in the development of entrepreneurial potential (case study: students of Tabriz University). Journal of Economic & Developmental Sociology, 4(2), 75-103. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2021.58715.1417
Ahmadzadeh, S., Safari, A., & Teimouri, H. (2022). Collective stupidity: influences on decision-making in knowledge-based companies. Management Decision, 60(5), 1257-1295. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2020-1380
Al-Omoush, K. S., Al Attar, M. K., Saleh, I. H. & Alsmadi, A. A. (2019). The drivers of E-banking entrepreneurship: an empirical study, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(2), 485-500. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2019-0113
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation. Journal of Management Development, 23(6), 518-550. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710410541114
Bahadori, S., Abdollahnia, H., Maleki, S., & Bagheri Tanha, M. (2022). Investigating the relationship between organizational entrepreneurship and organizational agility in knowledge-based companies, Journal of Economics and Business Research, 11(23), 65-73. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0013
Bui, H. T., Nguyen, H. T., & Chau, V. S. (2020). Strategic agility orientation? The impact of CEO duality on corporate entrepreneurship in privatized Vietnamese firms. Journal of General Management, 45(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307019886170
Casson, M. & Wadeson, N. (2007). The discovery of opportunities: Extending the economic theory of the entrepreneur, Small Business Economics, 28(4), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9037-7
Courpasson, D., Dany, F., & Martí, I. (2016). Organizational entrepreneurship as active resistance: A struggle against outsourcing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 131-160.
Cui, J. (2025). The explore of knowledge management dynamic capabilities, ai-driven knowledge sharing, knowledge-based organizational support, and organizational learning on job performance: evidence from chinese technological companies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02468. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27509.69602
Diwanti, D. P., Suryanto, S., Iswati, S., Agustina, T. S., & Notobroto, H. B. (2021). The effect of organizational culture and readiness to change on organizational entrepreneurship: The Role of Competence. Journal Manajemen Bisnis, 12(2), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v12i2.10330
Farias, C., Fernandez, P., Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (2020). Organizational entrepreneurship, politics and the political. In Organizational Entrepreneurship, Politics and the Political (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
Farias, C., Fernandez, P., Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (2020). Organizational entrepreneurship, politics and the political. In Organizational Entrepreneurship, Politics and the Political (pp. 1-12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1599186
Felizardo, A., Santos, E., Sousa, A., & Ratten, V. (2022). The perception of middle managers on the organizational environment for the promotion of entrepreneurship and innovation activities in organizations. Book In COVID-19 and Entrepreneurship, 86-99, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149248-7
Ferreira, J. Coelho, A. & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation, Tec novation, 92, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
Fischer, B., Salles-Filho, S., Zeitoum, C., & Colugnati, F. (2022). Performance drivers in knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms: a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(5), 1342-1367. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0264
Ghayor Baghbani, S. M., Pourang, A., & Tavasli, A. (2019). Identifying effective factors on the development of organizational entrepreneurship (case study: Khorasan Razavi education), Education and training scientific-research quarterly, 36(3), 29-52. [in Persian] http://qjoe.ir/article-1-2554-fa.html
Golestani Hashemi, S. M (2009). Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship Science, Isfahan, Jihad University Press. [in Persian] https://share.google/BkzOC2aaNeKhklcVf
Gomes, G., Seman, L. O., Berndt, A. C., & Bogoni, N. (2022). The role of entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning capability and service innovation in organizational performance. Revista de gestão, 29(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2020-0103
Hussinki, H., Paavo, R., Vanhala, M., Kianto, A. (2017). Intellectual capital, knowledge management practices and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital. 18, 4, 904-922. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2016-0116
Imani, A., Salarzehi, H., & Sayedi, F. (2016). Identifying and prioritizing the affective factors of institutionalizations dimensions executive organizational entrepreneurship (A study: The city of Bam automobiles Factory Kerman motor company), Public Management Researches, 9(31), 123-144. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2016.2516
Jafarnejad, A. Mohaghar, A. and Ekhtiarzadeh, A. (2012). A seven-stage growth model of academic new technology based firms to understanding the challenges of growth. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 5(4), 45-62. [in Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20080840.1391.5.2.5.1
Kantur, D. (2016). Strategic entrepreneurship: mediating the entrepreneurial orientation performance link. Management Decision, 54(1), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2014-0660
Kazanjian, R. K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2017). Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge‐based perspective. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset, 173-199.
Korani, Z. (2018). the Effect of knowledge management on organizational entrepreneurship among agricultural extension experts in Kermanshah Province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 8(2), 245-255.
Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship: A critical challenge for educators and researchers. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 42-60.
Lumpkin G.T & Dess G.G, (2001). Linking Two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
Mahdavi, H., Sheykh Zeynoddin, M., & Khodabandeh, L. (2013). An analysis of science & technology parks through the evaluation results of k-based companies in STPs, Roshd –e– Fanavari, 27(7), 53-60. [in Persian] http://roshdefanavari.ir/en/Article/20131
Maqsoudi Ganjeh, Y., Khani, N., & Alam Tabriz, A. (2019). Networking capability, business network structure, and commercialization performance in knowledge-based firms (Case study: Knowledge-based companies in Isfahan Province). Technology Development Management, 7(4), 151–180.
Nakhaei, G. R., Sobhani, A., Mostaghimi, M. R., & Hosseini, S. M. R. (2019). Explaining Indices and Organizational Entrepreneurship Patterns in Rural Cooperatives, Agricultural Economics Research, 11(44), 171-196. [in Persian]. https://jae.marvdasht.iau.irarticle_3849
Pilvar, N., Badizadeh, A., Hosseini, S. R., Zaboli, R. (2021). Presentation of organizational entrepreneurship development model based on knowledge management in GHazvin university of medical sciences, Journal of Development & Evolution Management, 45, 103-110. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/jer.2024.2013173.1055
Qasim, D., Shuhaiber, A., & Rawshdeh, Z. (2025). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on innovation performance: the role of knowledge sharing as a mediating factor. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00543-3
Sakhdari, K. (2016). Corporate entrepreneurship: A review and future research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8).
Swadi, A. F., & Al-Dalaien, A. A. (2021). Impact of organizational entrepreneurship characteristics on entrepreneurial orientation: Moderating role of firm size and education. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13 (3). 478-488. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.39
Wilson, N., Wright, M., & Kacer, M. (2018). The equity gap and knowledge-based firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 626-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.008
Yaqobi, J., & Najaflo, P. (2017). Identifying strategies for the development of organizational entrepreneurship in agricultural cooperatives (Study case: Abhar city), Journal of Studies in Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Agricultural Development, 4(1), 75-93. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22069/jead.2017.12246.1229