Journal of Business Management Perspective

Journal of Business Management Perspective

Investigating the relationship between the use of technological opportunities and the factors affecting it with the organization's financial performance from the perspective of branch managers in banks

Document Type : literature review

  1. Akin, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., & Wynstra, F. (2009). The Impact of Supply Chain-RelatedFactors on Environmental Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Turkey .Paper presented at the 18th IPSERA Conference.
  2. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61−83.
  3. Chen, CH., & Lien, N. (2012).Technological Opportunism and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Research.

10.Chin, W.W. (1998 ). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22(1),7-16.

11.Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Journal of ManagementScience, 32, 554-571.

12.Daft, R.L. & Weick, K.E. (1984).Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, 9)2(, 284–295.

13.Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U., & Webster Jr, F.E. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–37.

14.Dhebar, A. (1996). Speeding High-Tech Producer, Meet the Balking Consumer :SloanManagement Review, 37(2), 37−49.

15.Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J.M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(5), 77-90.

16.Grant, R.M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications (7th ed). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

17.Hills, S.B., & Sarin, S. (2003). From Market Driven to Market Driving: An Alternate Paradigm for Marketing High Technology Product and Innovations. Journal of MarketingTheory and Practice, 11(3), 13–24.

18.Hulland, J .(1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195-224.

19.Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something Old, Something New: A longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183−1194.

20.Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational Market Information Processing: Cultural Antecedents and NewProduct Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 318-335.

21.Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D.M. (2004). New Products, Salespromotions and Firm Value, with Application to the Automobile Industry. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 142−156.

22.Robertson, T.S., Eliashberg, J., & Rymon, T. (1995). New Product Announcement Signalsand Incumbent Reactions. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 1−15.

23.Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.

24.Sarkees, M. (2011). Understanding the Links Between Technological Opportunism,Marketing Emphasisand Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 23,785-795.

25.Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G.L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2001). Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E[1]business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47−60.

26.Srinivasan, R. (2000). Essays on Technological Opportunism in Adoption of Radical Technologies by Firms. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

27.Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–53.

  1. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5,171-80.

29.Wind , J., & Mahajan , V. (1997). Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development:An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 1−12