Journal of Business Management Perspective is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity, quality, and transparency in publishing. The journal applies a double-blind peer review process for all manuscripts, ensuring that the identities of both authors and reviewers remain concealed throughout the evaluation.
Our peer review policy is guided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, jointly issued by COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, and WAME (updated September 2022). By following these principles, the journal seeks to safeguard fairness, maintain ethical practices, and promote rigorous scholarly contributions in the field of Business Management.
Initial Editorial Screening
Upon submission, all manuscripts undergo an initial assessment by the editorial team. This stage focuses on relevance to the journal’s aims and scope, basic scholarly quality, originality, and adherence to author guidelines. Manuscripts that fail to meet these criteria or fall outside the journal’s scope may be rejected at this stage to ensure authors receive timely feedback and can pursue publication elsewhere.
External Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent expert reviewers for double-blind review. In certain cases, additional reviewers may be invited to provide specialized expertise. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript’s originality, methodological rigor, theoretical contribution, clarity of presentation, and overall relevance to the discipline of Business Management.
Decision and Feedback
Based on the reviewers’ reports and the editorial team’s assessment, the Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on each manuscript. Possible outcomes include acceptance, minor or major revision, or rejection. The journal aims to provide authors with an initial editorial decision within 1–2 weeks of submission and a full peer review outcome within 4–8 weeks, although timelines may vary depending on reviewer availability. Constructive feedback is provided in all cases, even when manuscripts are not accepted, to support authors in improving their work.
Role of Reviewers
Reviewers are vital to maintaining the quality and reputation of the journal. They are expected to:
Confidentiality and Ethics
All manuscripts are handled with strict confidentiality. Editors and reviewers must not share, copy, or disclose any part of a submission. Reviewer identities are protected, and author information is concealed to ensure fairness and impartiality. Exceptions may apply only in cases of suspected misconduct, in line with COPE guidelines.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers, editors, and authors are required to disclose any financial, professional, or personal relationships that may influence the review process. If a significant conflict of interest is identified, the reviewer or editor will recuse themselves to preserve the integrity of the process.
Final Authority
The Editor-in-Chief retains ultimate responsibility for all editorial decisions, ensuring that the review process remains impartial, ethical, and aligned with the journal’s commitment to advancing high-quality scholarship in Business Management.