تأثیر دوگانگی بازارگرایی و دوگانگی نوآوری بر عملکرد بنگاه

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 * کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران (نویسنده مسئول).

2 ** دانشیار، دانشگاه تهران.

3 *** استادیار، دانشگاه تهران.

چکیده

 چکیده     با توجه به رقابت روزافزون در کسب‌وکارهای صنایع غذایی و نقش مهم مؤلفه‌هایی همچون بازارگرایی و نوآوری در کمک به بنگاه­ها برای دستیابی به موفقیت در فضای پویای کسب‌وکارهای کنونی و همچنین با توجه به اهمیت عامل دوگانگی در دستیابی بنگاه به مزیت رقابتی، در پژوهش حاضر، تأثیر دوگانگی بازارگرایی و دوگانگی نوآوری بر عملکرد بنگاه­های فعال صنایع غذایی بررسی شده است؛ به این منظور اطلاعات مدیران و کارشناسان بنگاه­های فعال صنایع غذایی شرکت‌کننده در بیست‌و‌یکمین «نمایشگاه بین‌المللی صنایع کشاورزی، مواد غذایی، ماشین­آلات و صنایع وابسته» از طریق ابزار پرسشنامه گردآوری‌شده و با روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری تجزیه‌وتحلیل شد. نتایج نشان می­دهد توجه همزمان بر بُعد اکتشاف و بهره‌برداری در بازارگرایی بر ویژگی دوگانگی نوآوری در بنگاه تأثیر مثبت و مستقیم دارد؛ همچنین دوگانگی بازارگرایی از طریق دوگانگی نوآوری به‌صورت غیرمستقیم بر بهبود عملکرد بنگاه­ها تأثیرگذار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Atuahene-gima, K) .2005). Resolving the Capability – Rigidity. Journal of Marketing, 69(10), 61-83.
  2. Babai Zakliki, M A., & Alipour, M. (2014). The effects of market orientation, Knowledge related resources and reputational assets on banks’ performance. Journal of Business management perspective, 13(17), 35- 54. (In Persian)
  3. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Journal of academy management review, 28(2), 238–256.
  4. Cano-Garsia, F. J., Padilla-Munoz, E. M., & Carrasco-Ortiz, M. A. (2004). Personality and contextual variables in teacher burnout. Personality and Individual differences, 38(4), 929-940.
  5. Cao, Q., Dowlatshahi, S. (2005). The impact between virtual enterprise and information technology on business performance in an agile manufacturing environment. Journal of Operations Management, 23(5), 531-550.
  6. Ebrazeh, F. (2013). Investigating key success factors in software companies: Technology sourcing and system development ambidexterity (Master’s Thesis), Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Department of Management (in Persian).
  7. Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004a). The Antecdents, consequnces, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Journal of academy of management, 47(2), 209–226.
  8. Habibpour Gatai, K, Safari Shali, R. (2011). A Comprehensive manual for applying SPSS in survey research, Tehran: Louyeh, Motafakeran (In Persian).
  9. Hooley, G., Fahy, J., Greenley, G., Beracs, J., Fonfara, K., & Snoj, Boris. (2003). Market orientation in the service sector of the transition economies of central Europe. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1/2), 86-106.
  10. Hooley Graham, J., Greenley Gordon, E., Cadogan John, W., Fahy, J. (2005). The performance impact of marketing resources. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 18– 27.
  11. Hosseini, S. M. & Salar, J. (2012). Surveying the effect of market orientation and innovation on performance of food companies of Iran stock exchange. New Marketing Research Journal, 2(3), 107- 120. (In Persian).
  12. Hosseini, S. M., Jazani, N., Asadollahi, H. & Salar, J. (2012). Formulating a model of relationship between marke‌ orientation, learning orientation, innovation orientation and performance of food companies accepted in Bourse. Journal of Business management perspective, 11(9), 9- 23. (In Persian)
  13. Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review Journal, 57(4), 351-363.
  14. Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007.
  15. Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
  16. Kyriakopoulos, K, & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 219–240.
  17. Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Chu, C. P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision Journal, 46(7), 1002-1026.
  18. Luecke, R. (2003). Harvard business essentials: Managing change and transition. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
  19. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Journal of organization science, 2(1), 71-86.
  20. McCarthy, I.P. & Gordon, B.R) .2011(. Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: a management control system approach. R&D Management, 41(3), 240–258.
  21. Menguc, B, & Auh, S. (2008). The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity–firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 455-470.
  22. Mohsenin, Sh., Esfidani, M.R. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling: Lisrel. Tehran, Mehraban nashr (In Persian).
  23. Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920.
  24. Narver, J. & Slater, S. (1990). The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.
  25. Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & Maclachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-Product Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334-347.
  26. O’Reilly, Ch. A, & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-81.
  27. Sarkees, M., Hulland, J., & Prescott, J. (2010). Ambidextrous organizations and firm performance: the role of marketing function implementation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(2), 165–184.
  28. Sheremata, W. (2000). Centrifugal and Centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 389-408.
  29. Slater, S. F. (2001). Market orientation at the beginning of a new millennium. Managing service quality Journal, 11(4), 230-232.
  30. Tan, M, & Liu, Z. (2014). Paths to success: an ambidexterity perspective on how responsive and proactive market orientations affect SMEs’ business performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(5), 420–441.
  31. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, Journal of California management review, 38 (4), 8-30.
  32. Wei, Z., Zhao, J., & Zhang, C. (2014). Organizational ambidexterity, market orientation, and firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33(1), 134-153.
  33. World Trade Organization. (2015). International Trade Statistics, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2015_e/its2015_e.pdf
  34. Yannopoulos, P., Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2012). Achieving fit between learning and market orientation: Implications for new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 29(4), 531-545.
  35. Zhang, J, & Duan, Y. (2010). The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance. Management Decision Journal, 48(6), 849-867.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 تیر 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 17 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 دی 1399
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 11 دی 1399

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار