Developing a Model of Corporate Entrepreneurship Drivers in Knowledge-‎Based Firms

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, ‎Iran‎

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

3 Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, ‎Qazvin, Iran‎

4 Department of Industrial Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, ‎Iran‎

10.48308/jbmp.2026.241472.1703

Abstract

Introduction

Organizational entrepreneurship represents a transformative approach that ‎enables organizations to cultivate innovation, enhance competitiveness, and ‎create sustainable value in knowledge-intensive environments. In the context ‎of knowledge-based companies, which serve as critical engines for economic ‎growth and technological advancement, organizational entrepreneurship ‎becomes particularly vital for maintaining competitive advantage in rapidly ‎evolving markets. These companies, characterized by their reliance on ‎intellectual capital and technological innovation, require specialized ‎entrepreneurial drivers that align with their unique operational dynamics and ‎strategic objectives. The present study aims to develop a comprehensive, ‎contextually relevant model of organizational entrepreneurship drivers ‎specifically tailored to the needs and challenges of knowledge-based ‎companies operating in emerging economies‏.‏

Methods

This research employs a rigorous qualitative approach based on the Grounded ‎Theory methodology, following the systematic coding procedures developed ‎by Strauss and Corbin. The study population comprised 29 carefully selected ‎participants, including senior academic experts specializing in ‎entrepreneurship and innovation, experienced management consultants with ‎proven track records in knowledge-based enterprises, and founders or senior ‎executives of established knowledge-based companies in Kermanshah ‎Province. The sampling strategy utilized purposive and snowball sampling ‎techniques to ensure the inclusion of information-rich cases that could ‎provide deep insights into the phenomenon under investigation. Data ‎collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, ensuring ‎comprehensive coverage of all relevant concepts and categories. The ‎trustworthiness of the research was established through multiple validation ‎strategies, including member checking, expert validation, and peer ‎debriefing. For reliability assessment, inter-coder agreement was measured ‎using Cohen's Kappa coefficient, which yielded a robust value of 0.87, ‎indicating strong reliability and consistency in the coding process‏.‏

Results

The analysis revealed a sophisticated multi-dimensional framework of ‎organizational entrepreneurship drivers, organized into five interconnected ‎dimensions‏:‏‎ ‎

Causal Factors: The fundamental drivers initiating entrepreneurial activities ‎include strategic leadership commitment, characterized by active top ‎management support and visionary guidance; organizational architecture, ‎featuring flexible structures and decentralized decision-making processes; and ‎knowledge ecosystem, encompassing open communication channels and ‎systematic knowledge sharing mechanisms‏.‏

Contextual Factors: The environmental enablers comprise market dynamics ‎and business environment conditions; technological infrastructure, including ‎advanced information and communication technology systems; financial ‎ecosystem, involving accessible funding sources and investment ‎opportunities; academic-industrial collaboration through interaction with ‎educational and research institutions; and supportive government policies and ‎regulatory frameworks‏.‏

Intervening Factors: The mediating influences include organizational culture ‎elements such as innovation climate and risk tolerance; structural ‎characteristics involving hierarchy and coordination mechanisms; leadership ‎styles and management approaches; resource configurations including human, ‎financial, and technological assets; and stakeholder engagement strategies‏.‏

Strategic Initiatives: The implementation approaches encompass strategic ‎orientation through clear business strategies and competitive positioning; ‎knowledge management systems facilitating organizational learning and ‎capability development; and motivation structures including comprehensive ‎reward and incentive systems aligned with entrepreneurial outcomes‏.‏

Outcomes and Impacts: The resulting manifestations include cultural ‎transformation toward entrepreneurial mindset and behaviors; human capital ‎development through employee empowerment and continuous training; ‎innovation pipeline management via systematic project prioritization; and ‎collaborative synergy through cross-functional integration and partnership ‎development‏.‏

Conclusion

The proposed model offers a holistic framework that captures the complex ‎interplay of factors driving organizational entrepreneurship in knowledge-‎based companies. The research contributes significantly to both theoretical ‎understanding and practical implementation by providing a structured ‎approach to fostering entrepreneurial capabilities within knowledge-intensive ‎organizations. The model emphasizes the importance of simultaneous ‎attention to all identified dimensions and suggests that successful ‎organizational entrepreneurship implementation requires strategic alignment ‎across multiple organizational levels and functions. For practitioners, the ‎study offers actionable insights for designing intervention strategies and ‎development programs, while for researchers, it provides a foundation for ‎further empirical validation and theoretical refinement in different contextual ‎settings‏.‏

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the ‎public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors‏.‏

Authors' Contribution

First Author: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, ‎Formal Analysis, Writing - Original Draft Preparation; Second Author: ‎Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing; Third ‎Author: Supervision, Validation, Resources, Writing - Review & Editing; ‎Fourth Author: Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Writing - Review ‎& Editing‏.‏

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the ‎publication of this article‏.‏

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude to all the experts, consultants, and ‎industry professionals who generously shared their insights and experiences ‎during the data collection process. Special appreciation is extended to the ‎research participants from knowledge-based companies who contributed their ‎valuable time and expertise to this study. The authors also acknowledge the ‎methodological guidance received from qualitative research experts ‎throughout the investigation process.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects