چشم انداز مدیریت بازرگانی

چشم انداز مدیریت بازرگانی

نقش‌آفرینی راهبردی مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی در عصر اقتصاد دیجیتال: چارچوبی برای همراه اول

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه ارتباطات، دانشکده ارتباطات و رسانه، دانشگاه صدا و سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشکده معارف اسلامی و مدیریت، دانشگاه امام صادق (ع)، تهران، ایران
چکیده
اهداف: این پژوهش با هدف تبدیل مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی به یک اهرم راهبردی برای رهبری و ایجاد ارزش پایدار در اقتصاد دیجیتال انجام شده است. این پژوهش نقش راهبردی مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی را در همراه اول (شرکت ارتباطات سیار ایران-MCI) بررسی کرده و چشم‌انداز و مسیرهای مطلوب برای ارتقا مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی به سطح راهبردی را شناسایی می‌کند.
روش‌ها: این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و راهبرد مطالعه موردی و تحلیل مضمون مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با 30 نفر از ذی‌نفعان کلیدی به همراه تحلیل اسناد انجام شده است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها در شش مضمون کلیدی طبقه‌بندی شده‌اند: ۱) استقرار نظام راهبردی و یکپارچه، ۲) تمرکز هوشمندانه بر قابلیت‌های محوری دیجیتال، ۳) راهبری اکوسیستم نوآوری، ۴) پاسخگویی دیجیتال به نیازهای جامعه، ۵) شفافیت و اعتمادسازی، و ۶) تعهد پایدار به سرمایه انسانی و محیط زیست. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که یکپارچه‌سازی مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی با استراتژی دیجیتال و تمرکز بر خلق ارزش مشترک، می‌تواند موتور محرکه‌ای قدرتمند برای تحقق چشم‌انداز همراه اول مبنی بر تبدیل شدن به «محبوب‌ترین شرکت ایرانی» و «بزرگترین هلدینگ اقتصاد دیجیتال» باشد.
نتیجه‌گیری: این پژوهش بر اهمیت ادغام مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی با راهبرد سازمانی و تحول دیجیتال تاکید می‌کند. توصیه‌های عملی شامل تدوین نقشه راه مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی دیجیتال، ایجاد ساختار حاکمیتی موثر و افزایش شفافیت برای تقویت تاثیر راهبردی مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی است
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Strategic Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Digital Economy: A Framework for Hamrah-e Aval

نویسندگان English

Siavash Salavatian 1
Seyyed Mohammd Mahdi Sadeghi 2
1 Department of Communication, Faculty of Communication and Media, University of Radio and Television of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadegh University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Objectives: This study aims to transform Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into a strategic lever for leadership and sustainable value creation within the digital economy. It explores the strategic role of CSR at Hamrah-e Aval (Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran – MCI) and identifies the desired vision and pathways to elevate CSR to a strategic level.
Methods: This qualitative research employed a case study methodology and thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 30 key stakeholders, complemented by documentary analysis.
Results: The findings are categorized into six key themes: establishment of a strategic CSR system; focus on digital advantages; leadership of the innovation ecosystem; digital response to societal needs; transparency and trust-building; and commitment to human capital and the environment. The results indicate that a strategic CSR approach, linked with core technological capabilities and focused on creating shared value (CSV), can serve as a driving force for realizing Hamrah-e Aval’s vision of becoming the “largest digital economy holding” and the “most popular Iranian company.”
Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of integrating CSR with organizational strategy and digital transformation. Practical recommendations include developing a digital CSR roadmap, establishing an effective governance structure, and enhancing transparency to strengthen CSR’s strategic impact.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Strategic social responsibility
shared value creation
digital transformation
innovation ecosystem
first companion
  1. Abedi Jafari, H., Taslimi, M. S., Faghihi, A., & Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). Thematic analysis and thematic network: A simple and effective method for explaining patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management Thought, 5(2), 151-198. (In Persian)

    Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.

    Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2017). The role of governance in the diffusion of mobile phones in Sub-Saharan Africa. Telecommunications Policy, 41(10), 948-961.

    Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2018). Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 448-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239

    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

    Buhmann, K., & Bøgelund-B-B, T. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in the telecommunications sector: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28 (4), 1105-1116.

    Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

    Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303

    Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6

    Chen, Y., & Li, X. (2024). AI-Driven CSR: A New Paradigm for Competitive Advantage in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(2), 205-221.

    Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

    Engert, S., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2833-2850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.031

    Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman

    Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768

    Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2023). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 182 (1), 1-21.

    George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999-1023.

    Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in

    GSMA (2023), The Mobile Economy 2023, GSMA Head Office, London.Psychology, 7, 796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796

    Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. (2023). Bridging the Digital Divide with 5G: A Strategic CSR Imperative for Telecom Operators in Developing Economies. Telecommunications Policy, 47(8), 102591.

    Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & Abreu, M. C. S. (2015). Stakeholder theory as an ethical approach to effective management: applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review of Business Management, 17(55), 858-869.

    ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2020). Connecting humanity: Assessing investment needs of connecting humanity to the Internet by 2030. ITU Publications. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Conferences/GSR/2020/Documents/GSR-20_Connecting-Humanity_Discussion-Paper_EN.pdf* Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

    Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001

    Ma, W., & Li, G. (2022). How corporate social responsibility in the digital age affects brand equity. Journal of Business Research, 145, 385-395.

    Martin, K. E. (2019). Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 835-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3

    Nafisi, Sh. (2017). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in petrochemical companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 9(35), 117-134. (In Persian)

    OECD. (2020), A Systemic and Forward-looking Approach to the Digital Economy, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No.298, OECD Publishing, Paris.

    Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

    1. (2023). A critical review of the challenges and opportunities for sustainable e-waste management. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 117730.

    Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630

    Sherkat-e Ertebatat-e Sayyar-e Iran (MCI). (1402/2023). Annual Integrated Report for the fiscal year ending 20 March 2024. Retrieved from Codal.ir. [In Persian]

    Soltani, A. (2018). Designing a corporate social responsibility model in Iran’s banking industry (Case study: Bank Mellat). Business Management Perspective, (33), 119-138. (In Persian)

    Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Ditty, K. (2022). Strategic CSR: A new approach. In The Palgrave Handbook of Business and Human Rights (pp. 411-432). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

    Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

    van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide persists and reinforces the second-level digital divide: Data from the Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1533-1551.

    Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In Managing Digital Transformation (pp. 13-66). Routledge.

    Yahyazadehfar, M., Khorramdin, J., & Kordlar, A. (2009). Investigating the effect of social responsibility on the financial performance of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, 16(58), 107-124. (In Persian)

    Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage publications.