چشم انداز مدیریت بازرگانی

چشم انداز مدیریت بازرگانی

پژوهش های بین‌رشته‌ای در مدیریت

نوع مقاله : سخن سردبیر

نویسنده
بهمن حاجی پور
دانشیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
10.48308/jbmp.2025.240336.1678
چکیده
پژوهش‌های بین‌رشته‌ای در مدیریت پتانسیل بالایی برای ایجاد بینش‌های نوآورانه و پیشبرد نظریه‌های مدیریتی از طریق ادغام دانش و روش‌ها از رشته‌های مختلف دارد. این مقاله، چالش‌ها و فرصت‌های پژوهش بین‌رشته‌ای را بررسی می‌کند و بر نقش آن در پاسخ به مسائل پیچیده اجتماعی تأکید دارد. پژوهش بین‌رشته‌ای از طریق نوآوری نظری، پیشرفت‌های روش‌شناختی و پژوهش مسئله‌محور، به خلق نظریه‌های جدید و حل مسائل چندوجهی کمک می‌کنند. با این حال، چالش‌هایی نظیر فقدان انگیزه روشن برای استفاده از نظریه‌های سایر رشته‌ها، نبود زبان مشترک بین‌رشته‌ای، نظریه‌پردازی ناکافی و ملاحظات عملی مانند محدودیت زمان و فضا، موانعی برای این نوع پژوهش ایجاد می‌کنند. برای غلبه بر این چالش‌ها، توصیه‌هایی شامل بیان شفاف انگیزه پژوهش، پر کردن شکاف زبانی با توضیح دقیق مفاهیم، نمایش عمق نظریه‌پردازی از طریق ترکیب و هم‌افزایی، حفظ وفاداری نظری با استفاده دقیق از منابع رشته‌های دیگر ارائه شده است. این مقاله با تأکید بر نقش پژوهش بین‌رشته‌ای در غنی‌سازی نظریه مدیریت، بر نیاز به محیط علمی حامی و آگاه به روش‌ها و نظریه‌های بین رشته‌ای برای تحقق مشارکت‌های تحول‌آفرین در مدیریت تأکید می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پژوهش بین‌رشته‌ای
نوآوری نظری
پژوهش مسئله‌محور
چالش‌های بین‌رشته‌ای

عنوان مقاله English

Interdisciplinary Research in Management

نویسنده English

Bahman Hajipour
Associate Professor Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Interdisciplinary research in management holds significant potential for generating innovative insights and advancing management theory by integrating knowledge and methods from various disciplines. This article explores the challenges and opportunities of interdisciplinary research, emphasizing its role in addressing complex societal issues. Interdisciplinary research contributes to the development of new theories and the resolution of multifaceted problems through theoretical innovation, methodological advancements, and problem-oriented research. However, challenges such as the lack of clear motivation for utilizing theories from other disciplines, the absence of a common interdisciplinary language, insufficient theorizing, and practical constraints such as time and resource limitations pose obstacles to this type of research. To overcome these challenges, recommendations include clearly articulating research motivation, bridging linguistic gaps through precise conceptual explanations, demonstrating theoretical depth via synthesis and synergy, and maintaining theoretical fidelity by accurately utilizing resources from other disciplines. The article underscores the role of interdisciplinary research in enriching management theory and highlights the need for a supportive academic environment that is aware of interdisciplinary methods and theories to achieve transformative contributions in management.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Interdisciplinary Research
Theoretical Innovation
Problem-Oriented Research
Interdisciplinary Challenges
Baldwin, R. G., & Austin, A. E. (1995). Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration. The Review of Higher Education, 19(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0002
Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d
Bliese, P., Certo, S. T., Smith, A., Wang, M., & Gruber, M. (2024). Strengthening theory–methods–data links. Academy of Management Journal, 67(4), 893–900. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.0004
Boon, M., & Van Baalen, S. (2019). Epistemology for interdisciplinary research: Shifting philosophical paradigms of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0203-x
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.15.5.555.10002
Cheng, J. L. C., Henisz, W. J., Roth, K., & Swaminathan, A. (2009). From the editors: Advancing interdisciplinary research in the field of international business: Prospects, issues and challenges. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1070–1074. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.1070
Collin, A. (2009). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary collaboration: Implications for vocational psychology. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 9(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-009-9155-2
Dencker, J., Gruber, M., Miller, T., Rouse, E., & von Krogh, G. (2023). Positioning research on novel phenomena: The winding road from periphery to core. Academy of Management Journal, 66(5), 1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.0005
Grantham, T. A. (2004). Conceptualizing the (dis)unity of science. Philosophy of Science, 71(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1086/383008
Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2013). Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Management Science, 59(4), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1572
Hargadon, A. B. (1998). Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165951
Hassan-Montero, Y., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & De-Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Graphical interface of the SCImago Journal and Country Rank: An interactive approach to accessing bibliometric information. El Profesional de la Información, 23(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.may.07
Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2017). Collaboration and the complexity of scientific progress. Social Studies of Science, 47(3), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717717110
Jones, C. (2010). Interdisciplinary approach: Advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. Essai, 7(1), Article 26. http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol7/iss1/26
Katsouyanni, K. (2008). Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 7(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-3
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.
Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford University Press.
Makarova, E. A., Makarova, E. L., & Korsakova, T. V. (2019). The role of globalization and integration in interdisciplinary research, culture and education development. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i1.1957
Nisani, M. (2019). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. The Social Science Journal, 34(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3
Okhuysen, G. A., & Bonardi, J.-P. (2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.55662498
Ravasi, D., Zhu, J., Wan, W., Dorobantu, S., & Gruber, M. (2024). What makes research collaborations successful? Advice from AMJ authors. Academy of Management Journal, 67(3), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.0003
Rosenblat, T. S., & Mobius, M. M. (2004). Getting closer or drifting apart? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 971–1009. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502199
Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(4), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706851105
Shaw, J. D., Bansal, P., & Gruber, M. (2017). New ways of seeing: Elaboration on a theme. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.4002
Shaw, J. D., Tangirala, S., Vissa, B., & Rodell, J. B. (2018). New ways of seeing: Theory integration across disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4001
Shrestha, Y. R., He, V. F., Puranam, P., & von Krogh, G. (2021). Algorithm supported induction for building theory: How can we use prediction models to theorize? Organization Science, 32(3), 856–880. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1382
Siedlok, F., & Hibbert, P. (2014). The organization of interdisciplinary research: Modes, drivers and barriers. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12016
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
Thorne, H., & Persson, J. (2013). The philosophy of interdisciplinarity: Sustainability science and problem-feeding. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 44(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-013-9233-5
Van Baalen, P., & Karsten, L. (2012). The evolution of management as an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Management History, 18(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341211206865
Vinkler, P., Kretsopoulou, I., & Churchouse, T. (2015). UKERC interdisciplinary review: Research report. UK Energy Research Centre.
von Krogh, G., Roberson, Q., & Gruber, M. (2023). Recognizing and utilizing novel research opportunities with artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.4002