طراحی و تبیین مدل زمینه های سازمانی تداوم گرایش کارآفرینانه: رویکرد پژوهش آمیخته

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

در این تحقیق سعی شده است مدل زمینه های سازمانی تداوم گرایش کارآفرینانه طراحی و تبیین شود. تحقیقات  نشان داده اند شرکت هایی که سطوح بالایی از گرایش کارآفرینانه دارند، عملکرد بهتری نیز از خود به جای می‌گذارند. بنابراین، در پژوهش حاضر به دنبال شناسایی زمینه های سازمانی ایجاد و تداوم گرایش کارآفرینانه هستیم. پس از بررسی مطالعات قبلی در خصوص زمینه های گرایش کارآفرینانه، مطالعه موردی چندگانه شامل چهار شرکت ایرانی برای کشف زمینه‌های سازمانی تداوم گرایش کارآفرینانه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. سپس با استفاده از تحلیل محتوا ابعاد اصلی شناسایی و با بهره‌گیری از معادلات ساختاری تفسیری روابط میان ابعاد مشخص و مدل اولیه تحقیق حاصل گردید. در نهایت با آزمون کمی مدل اولیه تحقیق با استفاده از روش معادلات ساختاری مدل پژوهش آزمون و به تایید رسید. یافته ها نشان می دهد که زمینه‌های سازمانی تداوم گرایش کارآفرینانه عبارتند از مربیگری ، جانشین پروری، یادگیری سازمانی، مدیرعامل، کارمندان حرفه‌ای، همسویی استراتژیک و منابع و قابلیت های کلیدی. تمامی روابط فرض شده در مدل اولیه تحقیق پس از آزمون کمی مدل مورد تایید رسید و تنها یک مورد رابطه جانشین پروری و مدیرعامل تایید نشد. یافته های پژوهش برای محققان و مدیران فعال در کسب و کارها قابل بهره‌برداری خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Explaining Organizational Antecedents of Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation: Mixed Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohamad Mehdi Maleki
  • Bahman Hajipour
University of Shahid Beheshti
چکیده [English]

Objective: In this research, an attempt has been made to design and explain the organizational context model of the continuation of entrepreneurial orientation. Research has shown that companies with high levels of entrepreneurial orientation also perform better. Therefore, in the present study, we seek to identify the organizational contexts for the creation and continuation of entrepreneurial orientation.
Methodology: After reviewing previous studies on the fields of entrepreneurial orientation, a multiple case study involving four Iranian companies was examined to discover the central organizational context of entrepreneurial orientation. Then, using content analysis, the main dimensions were identified and by using interpretive structural equations, the relationships between the specified dimensions and the initial research model were obtained. Finally, with a quantitative test, the initial research model was tested and confirmed using the structural equation model equation method.
Findings: Findings show that the organizational contexts of continuing entrepreneurial orientation include coaching, succession, organizational learning, CEO, professional staff, strategic alignment, and key resources and capabilities. All the assumed relationships in the initial research model were approved after a quantitative test of the model, and only one case of the relationship between succession and CEO was not confirmed.
Conclusion: The research results show well the areas of continuity of entrepreneurial orientation and the relationship between them. Coaching leadership style is identified as the cornerstone of this important and other areas are affected by this variable. The research will be useful for researchers and business executives.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurial orientation
  • Sustainable entrepreneurial orientation
  • Organizational Antecedents
  • mixed method

مراجع

  1. Abolfazli, S. A., Salar, J., Rezaeian, A. (2015). “Relationship between Entrepreneurial Management, Market Orientation, and Performance”, Journal of Business Management Perspective, Vol. 24, No. 1, 63-78
  2. Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R. (2003), “Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 7-24.
  3. Baker, W.E. and Sinkula, J.M. (2009), “The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 443-464.
  4. Bagozzi, R. R., Yi, Y., and Philipps, L. W. (1991). “Assessing construct validity in organizational research”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.
  5. Boso, N., Oghazi, P., Cadogan, J.W. and Story, V.M. (2016), “Entrepreneurial and Market-Oriented activities, financial capital, environment turbulence, and export performance in An emerging economy”, Journal of Small Business Strategy, Vol. 26 No. 1, p. 1.
  6. Burns, P. (2012), Corporate Entrepreneurship: Innovation and Strategy in Large Organizations, 3rd ed., PalgraveMacmillan, London.
  7. Buttar, H.M., & Kocak, A. (2011). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation dynamic capabilities and firm performance: an exploratory study of small Turkish firms. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 7(3), 351-366.
  8. Cheraghi, N. (2014), “nvestigating the effect of talent management on manpower succession considering the information technology management of Shiraz National Petroleum Products Distribution Company”, Master Thesis in Public Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University (in Persian)
  9. Clercq, D.D., Dimov, D. and Thongpapanl, N. (2013). Organizational Social Capital, Formalization, and Internal Knowledge Sharing in Entrepreneurial Orientation Formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 37 (3): 505-537.
  10. Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., and Slevin, D. P. (2006), ‘Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 30, No 1, pp 57–81.
  11. Covin, J.G. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2011), “Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 855-872.
  12. Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
  13. Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32-55.
  14. Engelen, A., Flatten, T.C., Thalmann, J., & Brettel, M. (2014). The effect of organizational culture on entrepreneurial orientation: A comparison between Germany and Thailand. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 732-752.
  15. Fiedler, K. D., Grover, V., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995). An empirical study of information technology enabled business process redesign and corporate competitive strategy. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 17-30.
  16. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  17. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. 2011. "PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet." Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2): 139-151.
  18. Hair, J.F, Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM, European Business Review, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp. 2-24
  19. Hassani, J., Pasdar, K. (2017).” Evaluation of confirmatory factor structure, validity and reliability of the Persian version of the self-care scale in students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in 2013”, Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 16, 727-742 (in Persian)
  20. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., and Calantone, R. J. 2014. Common Beliefs and Reality about Partial Least Squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013), Organizational Research Methods, 17(2): 182-209.
  21. Hisrich, R. and Kearney, C. (2011), Corporate Entrepreneurship: How to Create a Thriving Entrepreneurial Spirit throughout Your Company, McGraw Hill Professional, United States.
  22. Kreiser, P.M. (2011), “Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning: the impact of network range and network closure”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 1025-1050.
  23. Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Dickson, P., and Weaver, K. M. (2010). “Cultural Influences on Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Impact of National Culture on Risk Taking and Proactiveness in SMEs,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 34(5), 959–983.
  24. Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., Fotiadis, T. A., & Zeriti, A. (2013). Resources and capabilities as drivers of hotel environmental marketing strategy: Implications for competitive advantage and performance. Tourism Management, 35, 94–110.
  25. Liu, H., Ke, W., Kee Wei, K., & Hua, Z. (2013). Effects of supply chain integration and market orientation on firm performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(3), 322-346.
  26. Lu, G. (2017), “Explaining customer orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on performance of SMEs: Evidence from China and Korea”, Global Journal of Management and Business Research, Vol. 16 No. 12, forthcoming.
  27. Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H. and Moss (2010), T. W. “Long-Term Orientation: Implications for the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Family Businesses,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 22(3-4), 241–264.
  28. Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135–172.
  29. Lumpkin, G. and Dess, G. (2001), “Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industrial life cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 429-451.
  30. Mahrous, A.A. and Genedy, M.A. (2019), "Connecting the dots: The relationship among intra-organizational environment, entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and organizational performance", Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 2-21.
  31. Miller, D. (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science 29(7): 770–791.
  32. Miller, D., and Le Breton-Miller, I. (2011). “Governance, Social Identity, and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Closely Held Public Companies,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 35(5), 1051–1076.
  33. Mintzberg, H. (1973), ‘Strategy making in three modes’, California Management Review, Vol 16, pp 44–58.
  34. Murimbika, M. and Urban, B. (2014), “Strategic innovation at the firm level: the impact of strategic management practices on entrepreneurial orientation”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, p. 1450016.
  35. Poon, J.M., Ainuddin, R.A., & Junit, S.O.H. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 24(1), 61-82.
  36. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.
  37. Rauch, A., Wirklund, J.,.Lumpkin, G.T, and Frese. M. )2009(. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (3): 761-787.
  38. Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S.Y., & Engelen, A. (2014). On Cultural and Macroeconomic Contingencies of the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 255-290.
  39. Spillecke, S. B., and M. Brettel (2014). “Antecedents and Performance Implications of a Sales Department’s Learning and Entrepreneurial Orientation in SMEs,” Journal of Small Business Management 52(3), 407– 426.
  40. Swailes, S. (2003). Professionalism: Evolution and measurement. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 130-149.
  41. Tuan Luu, T. (2017). Ambidextrous leadership, entrepreneurial orientation, and operational performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 229–253.
  42. Vega-Vazquez, M., Cossio-Silva, F. J., & Revilla-Camacho, M. Á. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation–hotel performance: Has market orientation anything to say?. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5089-5094.
  43. Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3-15.
  44. Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., and Lumpkin, G. T. (2013). “In Pursuit of Greatness: CEO Narcissism, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance Variance,” Journal of Management Studies 50(6), 1041–1069.
  45. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 171-180.
  46. Zahra, S. A., Jennings, D. F., and Kuratko, D. F. (1999), ‘The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: the state of the field’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 24, pp 45–65.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 شهریور 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 19 دی 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 دی 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار