الگوسازی مسیری ساختاری رابطه قابلیت های پویا و پویایی محیطی

نوع مقاله : مروری

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

طی سال­های اخیر یافتن راهی برای مواجه با محیط ­های پر تغییر و حفظ بقای سازمان به چالش مهمی در میان محققان حوزه مدیریت بدل شده است. در این میان رویکرد قابلیت­های پویا از اهمیت ویژه ­ای برخوردار شده است. بررسی متون موجود در این حوزه نشان می­ دهد یکی از الزامات پژوهشی، بررسی اثرات پویایی محیطی بر قابلیت­ های پویا است. لذا در این مقاله رابطه قابلیت­های پویا و پویایی محیطی مورد بررسی قرار خواهد گرفت. بدین منظور الگویی متشکل از سازه قابلیت های پویا (شامل قابلیت درک، قابلیت استفاده از فرصت­ها و قابلیت شکل‌دهی مجدد منابع) و پویایی محیطی (شامل پویایی فنی و پویایی بازار) طراحی شد. داده­ های پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه و بر مبنای پاسخ­های مدیران عالی شرکت­های تولیدی فعال در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران جمع­ آوری شد. نتیجه بررسی­ های انجام‌شده با استفاده از روش کمترین مربعات جزیی و نرم ­افزار SmartPLS نشان داد رابطه بین پویایی محیطی و قابلیت­های پویا به عنوان سازه­ های سطح بالاتر معنادار است. همچنین پویایی فنی بر قابلیت درک، قابلیت استفاده از فرصت­ها و قابلیت شکل­ دهی مجدد منابع، همچنین پویایی بازار بر قابلیت درک و قابلیت استفاده از فرصت­ها تأثیر مثبت دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Path-Structural Modeling of Dynamic Capabilities and Environmental Dynamics Relationship

چکیده [English]

 Maryam Nekooeezade*, Sayyed Mahmoud Hosseini**, Manizheh Ghareche***, Abbasali Hajikarimi****[1] Abstract     Find a way to cope with the changing environments and organizational survival has become a major challenge among management researchers in recent years. The dynamic capabilities view has gained particular importance. Reviews of the dynamic capabilities literatures reveal that survey effects of environmental dynamism on dynamic capabilities, is one of the research requirements. This paper examines the relationship between dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamics. So, a model of dynamic capabilities (including sensing capability, seizing capability and reconfiguration capability) and environmental dynamics (including technology and market dynamics) constructs was designed. The data were collected from the questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed by senior managers of production companies in Tehran stock exchange. We used SmartPLS. Results showed the relationship between environmental dynamics and dynamic capabilities as higher-level construct in the model is significant. Also, technological dynamics have a positive impact on sensing capability, seizing capability and reconfiguration capability. Market dynamics have a positive impact on sensing capability and seizing capability too. Keywords: Dynamic Capabilities; Environmental Dynamics; Sensing Capability; Seizing Capability; Reconfiguration Capability* Ph.D Student, Shahid Beheshti University (Corresponding Author).E-Mail: Mmnekooee@Yahoo.Com** Assistant Professor, Shahid Beheshti University.*** Assistant Professor, Shahid Beheshti University.**** Associate Professor, Shahid Beheshti University.

مراجع

  1. Barreto, I. (2011). Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future, Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280.
  2. Cao, L. (2011). "Dynamic capabilities in a turbulent market environment: empirical evidence from international retailers in China". Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(5), 455-469.
  3. D'Aveni, R. (1995). Coping with hypercompetition: utilizing the new 7S's framework. Academy of management executive, 9(3), 45-60.
  4. Dayuan, L., Baohua, X., & Yinglong, C. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and Their Functions: The Impact of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Nankai Business Review, 12(6), 60-68.
  5. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52-73.
  6. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, No.21, 1105-1121.
  7. Fredrickson, J. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 399-423.
  8. Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic organization, 7(1), 91.
  9. Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007.
  10. Lindblom, A., Olkkonen, R., Kajalo, S., & Mitronen, L. (2008). Market-sensing capability and business performance of retail entrepreneurs. Contemporary Management Research, 4(3), 219-236.
  11. Madsen, E. L. (2010). A dynamic capability framework–generic types of dynamic capabilities and their relationship to entrepreneurship. Strategic Reconfigurations: Building Dynamic Capabilities in Rapid-Innovation-Based Industries, 223-242.
  12. McKnight, B. A. (2012). Developing Dynamic Capabilities in Environments of Persistent Disturbances. (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Western Ontario).
  13. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (2006). Strategy making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235.
  14. Moss, S. (2010). Environmental dynamism, [online] (cited 22 march 2010) Available from http://www.psych-it.com.au/Psychlopedia/article.asp?id=379
  15. Paschke, J. R. (2009). Adaptive IT Capability and its Impact on the Competitiveness of Firms: A Dynamic Capability Perspective (Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University).
  16. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
  17. Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M., & Kotulic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(5), 913-929.
  18. Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2008). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance (No. 08-11). DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
  19. Schreyögg, G., & Kliesch-Eberl, M. 2007. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 913-933.
  20. Sfirtsis, M. (2011). Managing Paradoxes: Ambidexterity as a High-order Dynamic Capability. Google/book.com.
  21. Sharfman, M. P., & Dean Jr, J. W. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17(4), 681-700.
  22. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  23. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities And Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  24. Ullah, H. (2011). Environment related factors affecting the entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Education and Social Sciences (IJESS), 1(1).
  25. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
  26. Weidong, M., & Dingxiang, M. (2012, October). Empirical Study on the Relationship between Environmental Uncertainty, Dynamic Capabilities and Performance in North Jiangsu. In Business Computing and Global Informatization (BCGIN), 2012 Second International Conference on (pp. 836-839). IEEE.
  27. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33(1), 11.
  28. Wijbenga, F. H., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Entrepreneurial locus of control and competitive strategies--The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 566-589.
  29. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 991-995.
  30. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management studies, 43(4), 917-955.
  31. Zúñiga‐Vicente, J. Á., & Vicente‐Lorente, J. D. (2006). Strategic Moves and Organizational Survival in Turbulent Environments: The Case of Spanish Banks (1983–97). Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 485-519.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 12 مهر 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری:
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 دی 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار